Article View: net.micro.16k
Article #283Re: Re: National's 32332
From: Joe Mueller
Date: Fri, 16 May 1986 17:46
Date: Fri, 16 May 1986 17:46
21 lines
1398 bytes
1398 bytes
> > >>> "what's happened to the 32332?" <<< > > I hate to be sarcastic, but unless National has really cleaned up their > act since they came out with this family of processors (what a > nightmare NS was in 82/83!), the stage which comes after the press > release is to sit down and well..., kind-of..., design the part. > > Is there any indication that things are getting better? > > Mike > > Hmmm... Maybe I shouldn't bother people with this, but I wouldn't advise > anyone to plan a product on the new processor if things are the same. National demonstrated working 32332's during the Uniforum Confrerence February of 1986. I've personally seen equipment running unix on this chip. What else can I say? Joe Mueller ...!nsc!nsc-pdc!joemu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<568@nsc-pdc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!tektronix!reed!nsc-pdc!joemuReferences:
<746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <3441@reed.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site nsc-pdc.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!tektronix!reed!nsc-pdc!joemu From: joemu@nsc-pdc.UUCP (Joe Mueller) Newsgroups: net.micro.16k Subject: Re: Re: National's 32332 Message-ID: <568@nsc-pdc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 16-May-86 13:46:42 EDT Article-I.D.: nsc-pdc.568 Posted: Fri May 16 13:46:42 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 17-May-86 23:36:05 EDT References: <746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <3441@reed.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: NSC Portland Development Center, Portland Oregon Lines: 21