Re: Re: National's 32332

Article View: net.micro.16k

Article #287

#287

From: Kevin Meyer
Date: Thu, 22 May 1986 20:20

6 lines
824 bytes

> 
> I know someone who did benchmarks comparing the 32332 to the 68020,
> with all else being identical (RAM, etc).  A 15MHz 32332 is faster
> than a 16MHz 68020.
> 
Shouldn't this be posted to net.rumor?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <216@motsj1.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcs!mnetor!motsj1!kjm

References: <746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <1768@gitpyr.UUCP> <2020@hammer.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site motsj1.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcs!mnetor!motsj1!kjm
From: kjm@motsj1.UUCP (Kevin Meyer)
Newsgroups: net.micro.16k
Subject: Re: Re: National's 32332
Message-ID: <216@motsj1.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 22-May-86 16:20:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: motsj1.216
Posted: Thu May 22 16:20:57 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 23-May-86 19:48:06 EDT
References: <746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <1768@gitpyr.UUCP> <2020@hammer.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Motorola Semiconductor , San Jose, CA  95117
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message