Article View: net.micro.16k
Article #90Re: New and improved name for the 32032 (16032?)
From: Landon C. Noll
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 1984 09:16
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 1984 09:16
22 lines
1256 bytes
1256 bytes
> > Old New New and improved > > 16008 32008 ? > > 16016 32016 ? > > 16032 32032 32123 > > - - 32232 > > - - 32332 > > - - 32432 > > 16008? 16016? i think you were given some wrong information there. here is > a better list: > > old new > 08032 32008 > 16032 32016 > 32032 32032 <tricky> I never said that the chips didnt exist! I suggested that some wrong information was obtained because the 16016 is quite a bit different from the 32016; and the 16032 was connected with the 32016, not the 32032 as was suggested! Yes, the 16008 and 16016 chips were considered ... chongo <"There you go again... :-)"> /\../\
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1547@nsc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!nsc!chongoReferences:
<1372@bmcg.UUCP> <1487@nsc.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!nsc!chongo From: chongo@nsc.UUCP (Landon C. Noll) Newsgroups: net.micro.16k Subject: Re: New and improved name for the 32032 (16032?) Message-ID: <1547@nsc.UUCP> Date: Mon, 8-Oct-84 05:16:14 EDT Article-I.D.: nsc.1547 Posted: Mon Oct 8 05:16:14 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 9-Oct-84 02:57:11 EDT References: <1372@bmcg.UUCP> <1487@nsc.UUCP> Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale Lines: 22