Re: Series 32000 part numbering history

Article View: net.micro.16k

Article #97

#97

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 1984 17:04

10 lines
983 bytes

> Isn't there a clash of naming conventions between the NS32000 series
> and the WE 32000 chip?

In a word, yes.  But this is nothing new.  "4024" is not an unambiguous
part number either; Motorola had a series of old bipolar parts with
4000-series part numbers, and most of them clash with CMOS numbers now.
It's surprising that this problem isn't more frequent.
-- 
				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4504@utzoo.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <1610@nsc.UUCP>, <24200001@cmcl2.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer)
Newsgroups: net.micro.16k
Subject: Re: Series 32000 part numbering history
Message-ID: <4504@utzoo.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 19-Oct-84 13:04:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: utzoo.4504
Posted: Fri Oct 19 13:04:35 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 19-Oct-84 13:04:35 EDT
References: <1610@nsc.UUCP>, <24200001@cmcl2.UUCP>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message