Re: MicroEMACS plea

Article View: net.micro.6809

Article #685

#685

From: Jim Omura
Date: Sat, 31 May 1986 16:26

23 lines
1503 bytes

In article <3500151@uokvax.UUCP> emjej@uokvax.UUCP writes:
>
>We here in darkest Oklahoma managed to have some flavor of problem just as
>Jim Omura's postings of MicroEMACS for OS-9 came down the pike, so that here
>we have only part 1 of 7.  If anyone out there could mail them to me, I'd
>appreciate it considerably!
>
>					James Jones
>					ihnp4!okstate!uokvax!emjej

     It seems to me that a local reposting is in order.  If someone in
that area has a copy, they might try reposting it limited to a 'state'
wide posting rather than a 'country' wide posting.  If I were to re-post
it, it would have to be 'north america' wide, which would upset a lot
of site managers considerably (for good reason).

                                         Cheers! -- Jim O.

-- 
James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura
(416) 652-3880

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1227@lsuc.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura

References: <3500151@uokvax.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Newsgroups: net.micro.6809
Subject: Re: MicroEMACS plea
Message-ID: <1227@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 31-May-86 12:26:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: lsuc.1227
Posted: Sat May 31 12:26:53 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 31-May-86 13:20:40 EDT
References: <3500151@uokvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Organization: Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
Lines: 23
Summary: Possibly a local repost is in order

Reply to Parent Message