Re: BYTE "68000" issue

Article View: net.micro.68k

Article #1026

#1026

From: Mitchell Waite
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1986 05:03

9 lines
1051 bytes

Keywords: 

John I couldn't agree more with you. I found the 68000 artcle confusing in
some ways and great in others, but I found it a bit self serving. There was
not a word of what is WRONG with the 68000 for Unix (it isn't perfect) or
what its limitations are? It might have been better if BYTE used a smaller
68000 purchaser than Tektronix for its source for authors. I also felt that
the book review was crummy, as it left out some of the greatest boo for the
68000 and Macintosh assembly language.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1723@well.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!well!mitch

References: <3868@ut-ngp.UUCP> <1058@hoptoad.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!well!mitch
From: mitch@well.UUCP (Mitchell Waite)
Newsgroups: net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: BYTE "68000" issue
Message-ID: <1723@well.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 6-Sep-86 01:03:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: well.1723
Posted: Sat Sep  6 01:03:06 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Sep-86 20:30:50 EDT
References: <3868@ut-ngp.UUCP> <1058@hoptoad.uucp>
Reply-To: mitch@well.UUCP (Mitchell Waite)
Organization: Whole Earth Lectronic Link, Sausalito CA
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message