Re: Re: The Motorola 68030

Article View: net.micro.68k

Article #1118

#1118

From: Tim Smith
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1986 19:24

13 lines
1199 bytes

In article <807@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> daveh@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (Dave Haynie) writes:
>
[Talking about "Turbo" Amiga]
> etc.  Still, programs will have to be recompiled with a 68020 compiler to
> take full advantage of the processor, and of course, UN*X could be added.

Does the "Turbo" Amiga have an MMU?  If not, then adding UN*X is going
to be very hard.  Adding unix to the Compaq 386 box will be very easy.
-- 
What's the difference between a duck?

Tim Smith       USENET: sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim   Compuserve: 72257,3706
		Delphi or GEnie: mnementh

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3698@ism780c.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!caip!cbmvax!bpa!burdvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim

References: <877@Shasta.STANFORD.EDU> <807@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!caip!cbmvax!bpa!burdvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim
From: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Newsgroups: net.micro.68k,net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari16,net.micro.mac
Subject: Re: Re: The Motorola 68030
Message-ID: <3698@ism780c.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 30-Sep-86 15:24:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: ism780c.3698
Posted: Tue Sep 30 15:24:54 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 3-Oct-86 00:23:52 EDT
References: <877@Shasta.STANFORD.EDU> <807@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Reply-To: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message