Article View: net.micro.68k
Article #1132Re: The Motorola 68030
From: John Gilmore
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1986 20:40
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1986 20:40
16 lines
1244 bytes
1244 bytes
In article <200@mipos3.UUCP>, Ken Shoemaker writes:
> Should I feel vindicated that Mot
> has finally decided that on-chip memory management is a good idea?
Yes.
> And
> what about performance? Why would a new, ultra-high end user choose
> the 68030 over, say, the Clipper, or the MIPS chips...
Good question. Why would they choose the 80386 over these chips?
It's probably a very similar set of reasons.
(you get extra bonus credit if you just THINK about this and don't POST!)
--
John Gilmore {sun,ptsfa,lll-crg,ihnp4}!hoptoad!gnu jgilmore@lll-crg.arpa
May the Source be with you!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1172@hoptoad.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!hoptoad!gnuReferences:
<2270@gitpyr.UUCP> <7637@sun.uucp> <729@sauron.UUCP> <200@mipos3.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!hoptoad!gnu From: gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore) Newsgroups: net.micro.68k Subject: Re: The Motorola 68030 Message-ID: <1172@hoptoad.uucp> Date: Thu, 2-Oct-86 16:40:24 EDT Article-I.D.: hoptoad.1172 Posted: Thu Oct 2 16:40:24 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 4-Oct-86 06:39:34 EDT References: <2270@gitpyr.UUCP> <7637@sun.uucp> <729@sauron.UUCP> <200@mipos3.UUCP> Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco Lines: 16