🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

9 total messages Started by C.HUDSON Tue, 28 Oct 1986 17:47
What's Nu for VME.....
#1184
Author: C.HUDSON
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1986 17:47
32 lines
1895 bytes
>From: joel@gould9.UUCP (Joel West)
>Newsgroups: net.micro.mac,net.micro.68k
>Subject: What's Nu with VME for Mac?

>I know the Sun-3 is VME; aren't most of the other 680xx boxes
>also VME?  To my knowledge, only LMI (Symbolics?) and TI use Nu.

The VME bus standard was designed by Signetics, Motorola, and Mostek.
It follows that Motorola designs its 680** series to work well with
the VME and would encourage the use of the VME. It seems very unlikely
that a 680** box manufacturer would use anything but a VME bus. I'll
stick my neck out and state "All 680** box-makers use the VME bus."
(Anybody out there have a counterexample?)

>Would anyone care to comment on the technical advantages to using
>either bus?  From a marketing standpoint, I would think VME would
>offer a strong advantage.

I don't know much about the NuBus. I know however, in the past, TI
has designed busses which were not intended as general purpose, but
were designed for the 9900 product family (e.g. T-Bus, E-Bus).
Microprocessor-specific busses do not have much of a market advantage
unless the microprocessor supported is a technical marvel.

The VME bus provides a serial packet bus which operates autonomously of
the main parallel bus. This feature provides a standard interprocessor
communications channel, which facilitates distributed system/ multi-
processing environments.


	Cathy Hudson    ......ihnp4!hounx!hudson
Re: What's Nu for VME.....
#1185
Author: jimomura
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1986 05:19
25 lines
1449 bytes
In article <984@hounx.UUCP> hudson@hounx.UUCP (C.HUDSON) writes:
>

...
>the VME and would encourage the use of the VME. It seems very unlikely
>that a 680** box manufacturer would use anything but a VME bus. I'll
>stick my neck out and state "All 680** box-makers use the VME bus."
>(Anybody out there have a counterexample?)

     The Perkin-Elmer 68K boxes use VersaBUS.  The NCR Tower uses MultiBUS.
Many boxes have no bus at all or vestigial buses (low end Alpha Micro).
The New Frank Hogg QT-20X has a proprietary bus.  The SS-50 bus is used
by GIMIX.  The SS-64 bus was used by Helix.  I think Altos uses something
different, but I'm not sure what.

     Your close enough though.  Most good 68K boxes are VME.  Still, I'm
buying the Frank Hogg QT-20X.  The prices is *much* better.



-- 
James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura
(416) 652-3880
Re: What's Nu for VME.....
#1187
Author: Lawrence W. McVoy
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1986 17:11
18 lines
1334 bytes
In article <984@hounx.UUCP> hudson@hounx.UUCP (C.HUDSON) writes:
>It follows that Motorola designs its 680** series to work well with
>the VME and would encourage the use of the VME. It seems very unlikely
>that a 680** box manufacturer would use anything but a VME bus. I'll
>stick my neck out and state "All 680** box-makers use the VME bus."

I love when somebody makes a blanket statement like this :-)

Masscomp uses the multibus in their 68010 machines.  I think they also use 
it in their 68020 machines.  

Note: I'm not saying it's a good or a bad idea, 
      I just be relaten da facts, jack.
-- 
Larry McVoy 	        mcvoy@rsch.wisc.edu, 
      		        {seismo, topaz, harvard, ihnp4, etc}!uwvax!mcvoy

"They're coming soon!  Quad-stated guru-gates!"
Re: What's Nu for VME.....
#1188
Author: Paul Campbell
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1986 17:50
21 lines
1323 bytes
In article <984@hounx.UUCP> hudson@hounx.UUCP (C.HUDSON) writes:
>It seems very unlikely
>that a 680** box manufacturer would use anything but a VME bus. I'll
>stick my neck out and state "All 680** box-makers use the VME bus."
>(Anybody out there have a counterexample?)
>
>	Cathy Hudson    ......ihnp4!hounx!hudson


	I think most people know that we do a lot of 68XXX ports .... I would
make a rough guess that about half of the boxes we see these days are VMEbus,
(this is definitely an increasing trend) most of the rest are spread amoung
(in no particular order) multibus, S100 (yes there are still some of them out
there!), UniBus and proprietary buses (still quite common)



		Paul Campbell
		UniSoft Systems

		..!ucbvax!unisoft!paul
Re: What's Nu for VME.....
#1189
Author: Jeff Lee
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1986 17:56
6 lines
778 bytes
Who (or what organization) should I contact in order to obtain A VMEbus
definition?
-- 
Jeff Lee
CSNet:	Jeff @ GATech		ARPA:	Jeff%GATech.CSNet @ CSNet-Relay.ARPA
uucp:	...!{akgua,allegra,hplabs,ihnp4,linus,seismo,ulysses}!gatech!jeff
Re: MC680x0 with the VME Bus
#1190
Author: Mark Campbell
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1986 20:18
16 lines
1410 bytes
In article <984@hounx.UUCP> hudson@hounx.UUCP (C.HUDSON) writes:
>>I know the Sun-3 is VME; aren't most of the other 680xx boxes
>>also VME?  To my knowledge, only LMI (Symbolics?) and TI use Nu.
>
>The VME bus standard was designed by Signetics, Motorola, and Mostek.
>It follows that Motorola designs its 680** series to work well with
>the VME and would encourage the use of the VME. It seems very unlikely
>that a 680** box manufacturer would use anything but a VME bus. I'll
>stick my neck out and state "All 680** box-makers use the VME bus."
>(Anybody out there have a counterexample?)

The NCR Tower family (Tower 1632, Tower XP, MiniTower, MiniTower 32,
Tower 32) all use Motorola processors with Multibus I.
-- 

Mark Campbell    Phone: (803)-791-6697     E-Mail: !ncsu!ncrcae!sauron!campbell
Re: What's Nu for VME.....
#1191
Author: clewis
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1986 19:10
18 lines
1422 bytes
In article <2880@rsch.WISC.EDU> mcvoy@rsch.WISC.EDU (Lawrence W. McVoy) writes:
>In article <984@hounx.UUCP> hudson@hounx.UUCP (C.HUDSON) writes:
>>It follows that Motorola designs its 680** series to work well with
>>the VME and would encourage the use of the VME. It seems very unlikely
>>that a 680** box manufacturer would use anything but a VME bus. I'll
>>stick my neck out and state "All 680** box-makers use the VME bus."
>
>I love when somebody makes a blanket statement like this :-)

So do I - a single Spectrix XL machine has the following "buses": Multibus, 
Intel iLBX (actually, Multibus P2 connector), X-Bus (extension of 68020
pins), MX-bus (ribbon-cable), Intel iSBX bus and the FIFO.  Not a VMEbus in
the lot! :-)
-- 
Chris Lewis
Spectrix Microsystems Inc,
UUCP: {utzoo|utcs|yetti|genat|seismo}!mnetor!spectrix!clewis
Phone: (416)-474-1955
Re: What's Nu for VME.....
#1192
Author: Dave Hsu
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1986 14:17
32 lines
1993 bytes
In article <2880@rsch.WISC.EDU> mcvoy@rsch.WISC.EDU (Lawrence W. McVoy) writes:
>In article <984@hounx.UUCP> hudson@hounx.UUCP (C.HUDSON) writes:
>>It follows that Motorola designs its 680** series to work well with
>>the VME and would encourage the use of the VME. It seems very unlikely
>>that a 680** box manufacturer would use anything but a VME bus. I'll
>>stick my neck out and state "All 680** box-makers use the VME bus."
>
>I love when somebody makes a blanket statement like this :-)
>
>Masscomp uses the multibus in their 68010 machines.  I think they also use 
>it in their 68020 machines.  
>-- 
>Larry McVoy 	        mcvoy@rsch.wisc.edu, 

They actually use Multibus II in the '010 machines, and a slightly
modified (?, maybe just more careful part selection and shorter
cabling) version in the '020 units, to bump the bus speed up to ~30mhz.

Most Sun 2's, I think, are still Multibus, as were the Callans and
countless other Unix boxen.  Strange how they ended up with
Intel-derived things, isn't it...

-dave
-- 
David Hsu  (301) 454-1433 || -8798 || -8715
Communications & Signal Processing Laboratory	/ EE Systems Staff
Systems Research Center, Bldg 093		/ Engineering Computer Facility
The University of Maryland			**  These guys disavow all  **
College Park, MD 20742				** knowledge of my postings **
ARPA: hsu@eneevax.umd.edu    UUCP: [seismo,allegra]!umcp-cs!eneevax!hsu

"The Dirt molecule..."
Re: What's Nu for VME.....
#1193
Author: Bob Amen
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1986 21:29
30 lines
1713 bytes
In article <2880@rsch.WISC.EDU>, mcvoy@rsch.WISC.EDU (Lawrence W. McVoy) writes:
> In article <984@hounx.UUCP> hudson@hounx.UUCP (C.HUDSON) writes:
> >It follows that Motorola designs its 680** series to work well with
> >the VME and [...]
> >I'll stick my neck out and state "All 680** box-makers use the VME bus."
> 
> I love when somebody makes a blanket statement like this :-)
> 
> Masscomp uses the multibus in their 68010 machines.  I think they also use 
> it in their 68020 machines.  

	And Masscomp is currently working on a VMEbus machine...all their newer
machines will be VMEbus...that is when they get it all working, including
a VME to Multibus card.

	In fact there are several 68000 machines on the Multibus because it
was out there and controlers were available before the VMEbus was accepted
here (it was originally called the Eurobus with some differences).
> 
> Larry McVoy 	        mcvoy@rsch.wisc.edu, 
>       		        {seismo, topaz, harvard, ihnp4, etc}!uwvax!mcvoy

	Bob Amen
	Chesapeake Bay Institute/Johns Hopkins University

UUCP:	seismo!-\
		 >umcp-cs!\
	allegra!/	   \
			    >aplcen!quequeg!amen
	decvax!decuac!-----/
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads