Re: making additional 256K automatic

Article View: net.micro.amiga

Article #5289

#5289

From: Matt Dillon
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 1986 08:40

10 lines
965 bytes

>Jeff Kesselman
>This would have the added effect of making all the cheaper 256k add in modules
>from third parties obsolete. Nasty, but since they are seriously underpricing
>C/A's 256K add on, it might make some sense for them to do it.

	Didn't think of that.  It doesn't have to be at the C-A level...
they could just mandate dealers stick in the 256K of ram themselves.

					-Matt

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8611070840.AA19302@cory.Berkeley.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon
From: dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: making additional 256K automatic
Message-ID: <8611070840.AA19302@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Fri, 7-Nov-86 03:40:29 EST
Article-I.D.: cory.8611070840.AA19302
Posted: Fri Nov  7 03:40:29 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Nov-86 04:04:01 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 10