Thread View: net.micro.apple
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Earle A .Sugar
Wed, 29 Oct 1986 17:45
Apple ][ (early) trade ups?
Author: Earle A .Sugar
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1986 17:45
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1986 17:45
8 lines
1065 bytes
1065 bytes
I have read postings concerning Apple accepting trade-ins of //e boards towards a //GS. I have an early (I mean REAL early, serial #2047, 1977 vintage) and I would like to trade it in for a //GS. Does the deal for the //e apply to original ][s also? Or, is the computer worth more as an antique? It has the original 'red book' manual complete with hand-drawn diagrams by Woz and a complete source-code listing of the monitor rom, 'sweet-16' interpreter, and mini-assembler inside. Of course, the machine has been upgraded since it came out of the factory. Ever try to run DOS with 4k on the board?
Re: Apple ][ (early) trade ups?
Author: Colin Jenkins
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1986 02:34
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1986 02:34
27 lines
2274 bytes
2274 bytes
In article <3859@jhunix.UUCP>, ins_aeas@jhunix.UUCP (Earle A .Sugar) writes: > I have read postings concerning Apple accepting trade-ins of //e boards > towards a //GS. I have an early (I mean REAL early, serial #2047, 1977 vintage) > and I would like to trade it in for a //GS. Does the deal for the //e apply to > original ][s also? Or, is the computer worth more as an antique? It has the > original 'red book' manual complete with hand-drawn diagrams by Woz and > a complete source-code listing of the monitor rom, 'sweet-16' interpreter, and > mini-assembler inside. Of course, the machine has been upgraded since > it came out of the factory. Ever try to run DOS with 4k on the board? I don't know about anyone else, but I wouldn't dream of selling the above machine, and you may be right- it might pull in more bucks as an antique. Besides that though, I sincerely doubt that the upgrade will function properly in an old II (or even II+). For starters the //e keyboard has upper and lower case, not to mention the function keys (although a joystick could substitute for function keys). Probably Apple wants the //e motherboards so their roms can be destroyed. They probably would want to keep hold of the MMU and IOU chips as they are custom built. I would guess that they are not too concerned about roms from machines as old as yours. Beyond that, if Apple was planning to recover chips from the old //e motherboard, the chips in your Apple II are probably useless to them. Still, I would suggest you go to the source and write to Apple directly. All that aside, *I* wouldn't part with your machine- that's a piece of history. Colin
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads