🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.micro.atari
Article #106

Atari 400 48K board survey

#106
From: utzooutcsrgvnewman
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 1983 16:56
17 lines
1232 bytes
I would like to collect information on 48K memory boards for the Atari 400.
If you have first-hand experience with one (e.g. own one and have used it
enough to know how well it works) please mail me your comments on how well
the board works, quality of parts, manufacturer, and price and if there is
sufficient response, I will post a summary. If you obtained a bare board
and built it yourself, your comments would also be of interest. I fit in
the latter category - I got a 48K/52K bare board from Tiny Tek in Texas,
built it carefully using mil-spec components, and it didn't work properly
at all. It is now somewhere between here and Texas. Apparently the 400 is
very sensitive to the brand of 64K dram you use, with their board anyway.
I've seen boards in local stores from a Canadian company, Inhome Software,
that seem to work fine. Thnx in advnx.

Ken Newman
Univ. of Toronto
decvax!utzoo!utcsrgv!newman
Technical Details
Message-ID: <bnews.utcsrgv.1287>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: utzoo!utcsrgv!newman
Newsgroups: net.micro.atari
Title: Atari 400 48K board survey
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.1287
Posted: Fri Apr 15 16:56:56 1983
Received: Fri Apr 15 17:30:25 1983
Subject: Atari 400 48K board survey
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 1983 16:56:56 +0000
Message-ID: <bnews.utcsrgv.1287>