Article View: net.micro.atari
Article #1882--- Action! VS. C ---
From: nep.pgelhausen
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1986 01:35
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1986 01:35
16 lines
1275 bytes
1275 bytes
I have used C/65. My big problem w/ it is that it does not compile into binary, but it produces MAC/65 assembly code. It is nice to have this OPTION, but not to be forced into it. DISK SPACE GOES FAST!. Forget about the extra time to assemble it! Unless you have a hard disk it does not seem worth it. Deep Blue C (from APX) produces a small intermediate code file (similar to the p-code used by UCSD Pascal systems...but it is a c-code I guess) that needs to be run with an interpreter package. It is not as bad as it sounds, but Action! is definately faster. So long for now, -Richard Hartman max.hartman@ames-vmsb ------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8601040144.AA01496@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!info-atariShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!info-atari From: nep.pgelhausen@AMES-VMSB.ARPA Newsgroups: net.micro.atari Subject: --- Action! VS. C --- Message-ID: <8601040144.AA01496@ucbvax.berkeley.edu> Date: Fri, 3-Jan-86 20:35:00 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8601040144.AA01496 Posted: Fri Jan 3 20:35:00 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 5-Jan-86 01:04:49 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: nep.pgelhausen@ames-vmsb.ARPA Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 16