🚀 go-pugleaf

Your point about posting to a source group is well taken. I would like to see
pc, atari, and amiga groups in net.source, for this reason. I would be just as
happy with mod.source.<those things>.

I have to disagree about the utility of binaries. I many cases these computers
do not come with the compilers, etc, needed to regenerate the binaries from
source. In other cases the source *is* proprietary, while the binary isn't.
This can involve use of a local or licensed library to perform interfacing,
etc. I would rather have something for nothing than nothing at all.

There is little reason to worry about a binary "trojan horse" on these
machines, since there are no "outside users" to get at information, and the
o/s manages to trash the file system often enough without help.

PS: I think the atari make a GREAT output terminal for color graphics on a
UNIX box, but I wouldn't buy a development system to compile source, since
that's not my intended use. Binaries are fine, they allow other use for my
graphics subsystem.
-- 
	-bill davidsen

	seismo!rochester!steinmetz!--\
       /                               \
ihnp4!              unirot ------------->---> crdos1!davidsen
       \                               /
        chinet! ---------------------/        (davidsen@ge-crd.ARPA)

"It seemed like a good idea at the time..."