Article View: net.micro.atari
Article #2478Splitting the group.
From: peter
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1986 01:23
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1986 01:23
12 lines
1065 bytes
1065 bytes
I would have to vote yes, if I had a vote. I have no interest in the 520ST: my
personal opinion is that it's a pretty good IBM lookalike with a 68000 in it:
not a true next-micro-generation machine. On the other hand I do use an 800 and
find it quite usable for mucking around on.
Speaking of which...
Is ACTION! the only decent compiler available for the 800? I'd kind of like to
keep some sort of compatibility with my IBM and UNIX 'C' programs.
--
-- Peter da Silva
-- UUCP: ...!shell!{baylor,graffiti}!peter; MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<623@baylor.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!soma!bcm5000!baylor!peterShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!soma!bcm5000!baylor!peter From: peter@baylor.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.atari Subject: Splitting the group. Message-ID: <623@baylor.UUCP> Date: Wed, 12-Feb-86 20:23:03 EST Article-I.D.: baylor.623 Posted: Wed Feb 12 20:23:03 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 16-Feb-86 03:52:44 EST Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX Lines: 12