Thread View: net.micro.atari
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by jamesp
Thu, 05 Dec 1985 06:40
ST Questions
Author: jamesp
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1985 06:40
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1985 06:40
20 lines
1602 bytes
1602 bytes
Quick Question: Does the Atari 520ST have video display circuitry or is the 68000 bogged down hopelessly like the Macintosh? I have this friend that keeps bugging me, say that the cpu will be operating at only one third of its full capability, because of the need for video refresh, etc. Hearing "Its processor is as slow as a Mac" is making me get homicidal <heavy breathing, flared nostrils, clenched fists!> :^) And a few more questions: Does TOS (or whatever the OS is called) support the same, standard prompt-based, line-oriented interaction as do UNIX and MS-DOS and CPM? Or am I going to be forced to use the GEM metaphor (ugh!). I much prefer sitting there looking at a prompt and seeing the screen scroll for most of my work. Much Thanx, <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> "All that is gold does not glitter; tektronix!orstcs!jamesp Not all those who wander are lost." (In real life: James Perkins)
Re: ST Questions
Author: Jwahar R. Bammi
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1985 19:04
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1985 19:04
39 lines
2203 bytes
2203 bytes
> Quick Question: > > Does the Atari 520ST have video display circuitry or is the 68000 bogged down > hopelessly like the Macintosh? I have this friend that keeps bugging me, say > that the cpu will be operating at only one third of its full capability, > because of the need for video refresh, etc. Hearing "Its processor is as slow > as a Mac" is making me get homicidal <heavy breathing, flared nostrils, > clenched fists!> :^) It does have hardware to support graphics. The 68000 is certainly not bogged down. The Nov. 85 Byte article comparing C compilers for the Mac. had some benchmarks. The ST (using AClyon C compiler) ran these benchmarks at 2 to 3 times the speed of the best figures published there. The sizes were in the same league. So now you can make your friend eat his words :-) > > And a few more questions: > > Does TOS (or whatever the OS is called) support the same, standard prompt-based, > line-oriented interaction as do UNIX and MS-DOS and CPM? Or am I going to be > forced to use the GEM metaphor (ugh!). I much prefer sitting there looking at > a prompt and seeing the screen scroll for most of my work. Tos itself does not have a command processor. There are three that i have used. - Micro C Shell: extermely nice. Much like the one i am using now. - command.prg : comes with the development system. Msdos like. - Hos: comes with Habba C. Unix like, not quite as nice as Micro C Shell. -- Jwahar R. Bammi Usenet: .....!decvax!cwruecmp!bammi CSnet: bammi@case Arpa: bammi%case@csnet-relay CompuServe: 71515,155
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads