🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.micro.atari16
Article #1729

uuencoded binaries -- we don't all have the same compiler

#1729
From: Bill Silvert
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1986 10:54
17 lines
1565 bytes
In the discussion about uuencoded binaries vs. source, everyone seems to
assume that we all have compatible compilers.  We don't.  For example, I
have the Modula-2 developers' kit, which is very nice but doesn't do
much of a job on C sources.

I've had no problem with uuencoded files though -- I decode them on the
Unix machine that is on the net and send the binaries down using xmodem
or kermit.  All the uudecodes that I have seen really seem written to
run under Unix anyway, and maybe this is why they don't run OK on the ST.

Sources for uudecode and xmodem have been posted to the net, and there
are tons of PD xmodem packages for the ST (my favourite is xmdm.tos from
the group at Case, via bammi, which is much more robust and reliable
than the others I have tried).  The time may be ripe for reposting of
these sources, preferably with enough defines so that they will compile
on any Unix engine (my versions are heavily hacked for specialized use
on my machine and may not be very portable).
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2014@dalcs.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsri!utai!garfield!dalcs!silvert

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 ARLENE 1/1/85; site dalcs.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsri!utai!garfield!dalcs!silvert
From: silvert@dalcs.UUCP (Bill Silvert)
Newsgroups: net.micro.atari16
Subject: uuencoded binaries -- we don't all have the same compiler
Message-ID: <2014@dalcs.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 6-Sep-86 06:54:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: dalcs.2014
Posted: Sat Sep  6 06:54:08 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 8-Sep-86 02:45:15 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Marine Ecology Lab.
Lines: 17