Re: --- Megamax Printf bug ---

Article View: net.micro.atari16

Article #311

#311

From: Tainter
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1986 15:16

13 lines
1120 bytes

> 
> Despite Jwahar R. Bammi's rebuttal, the problem described (no printing
> of statements not  ending in '\n' until explicit buffer flush) is a bug.
> It is possible to use fflush(stdout) to get around it, as he describes,
> but that is not how most standard library printf()s require things.
> Sorry, Jwahar.
> 			-Richard Hartman
> 			nep.pgelhause@ames-vmsb
Really?  Most of the printf()s I have experienced have had this "feature".

The "bug" is not in printf().  The bug is in the OS where you cannot set a NOT
BUFFERED flag.
--j.a.tainter

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1746@ihlpg.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ihlpg!tainter

References: <8603270054.AA00660@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpg.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ihlpg!tainter
From: tainter@ihlpg.UUCP (Tainter)
Newsgroups: net.micro.atari16
Subject: Re: --- Megamax Printf bug ---
Message-ID: <1746@ihlpg.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 31-Mar-86 10:16:29 EST
Article-I.D.: ihlpg.1746
Posted: Mon Mar 31 10:16:29 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 2-Apr-86 01:45:04 EST
References: <8603270054.AA00660@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message