Article View: net.micro.atari16
Article #592Re: 502ST reliability?
From: Mike Hojnowski
Date: Sat, 03 May 1986 03:10
Date: Sat, 03 May 1986 03:10
11 lines
1200 bytes
1200 bytes
<> I've had my 520ST for about 5 months now without a bit of trouble. I've done the upgrade (complete with resistors), and installed ROMS's without incident. I leave everything but the monitor on 24 hours a day. I'm not sure if that's supposed to be good or bad for it. Anyone know? The only precautions I've taken with mine are to use a filtered-to-death ISOBAR power supply, and to crate up the beast in it's original boxes if I take it anywhere. All in all, I'm quite impressed by the reliability. -- Mike Hojnowski UUCP: ..rochester!moscom!jgpvax!mqh CSNET: "moscom!jgpvax!mqh"@ritcv
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<139@jgpvax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!orsvax1!pyrnj!caip!sri-spam!nike!styx!lll-crg!seismo!rochester!ritcv!moscom!jgpvax!mqhReferences:
<860429-094953-1244@Xerox>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!orsvax1!pyrnj!caip!sri-spam!nike!styx!lll-crg!seismo!rochester!ritcv!moscom!jgpvax!mqh From: mqh@jgpvax.UUCP (Mike Hojnowski) Newsgroups: net.micro.atari16 Subject: Re: 502ST reliability? Message-ID: <139@jgpvax.UUCP> Date: Fri, 2-May-86 23:10:47 EDT Article-I.D.: jgpvax.139 Posted: Fri May 2 23:10:47 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 7-May-86 01:45:01 EDT References: <860429-094953-1244@Xerox> Organization: any unified, consolidated group of elements Lines: 11