Article View: net.micro.atari16
Article #1676Re: Uudecode wierdidities, ue 3.7 (from Turner*Imagen),etc.
From: Jim Omura
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 1986 03:14
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 1986 03:14
26 lines
1670 bytes
1670 bytes
In article <5661@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> paone@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Phil Paone) writes:
>
> I also was unable to do anything. I didn't get the TOS error 35,
>but when I ran a crash utility, I saw that I had a bus error.
> I catted all files together after removing the signitures. Then
>I uudecoded it without error, then I used xmodem to transfer it to my
>ST and VOLIA, it didn't work.
>
>
>Phil Paone
This really emphasizes the importance of posting real source code
instead of Uuencoded files. Often a slightly broken source can be repaired
without reposting the whole code. Uuecoded files are generally scrap when
they are busted. It makes me wonder how much Net time is going to be wasted
because of the bad MicroEMACS sending. If it's re-sent, how much confusion
is going to result?
Cheers! -- Jim O.
--
James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura
(416) 652-3880
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1326@lsuc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!lsuc!jimomuraReferences:
<517@elmgate.UUCP> <5661@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura) Newsgroups: net.micro.atari16 Subject: Re: Uudecode wierdidities, ue 3.7 (from Turner*Imagen),etc. Message-ID: <1326@lsuc.UUCP> Date: Wed, 3-Sep-86 23:14:27 EDT Article-I.D.: lsuc.1326 Posted: Wed Sep 3 23:14:27 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 3-Sep-86 23:56:49 EDT References: <517@elmgate.UUCP> <5661@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura) Organization: Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto Lines: 26 Keywords: uudecode emacs ST kermit errors Summary: This is why sources should be posted.