🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.micro.atari8
Article #10

The correct use of the atari sub-groups

#10
From: Malloy
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1986 08:07
58 lines
3480 bytes
> Newsgroups: net.micro.atari8
> Subject: re CPM/68K vs TOS
> 
> Terry-
> Hmmm, looks like that we've got a problem here...
> When the ST was presented to the public all testers told that it is
> using an enhanced CPM/68k. They also told that the disks use the IBM
> PC format. Actually it's the same, except 2 small differences. If you
> add a 5" floppy to the ST you can transfer ONE file at a time (with
> more you get problems with the file allocation table) from the PC to
> the ST and vice versa. In the 'Hitchhikers Guide to the BIOS' and
> in the documentation they compare their system quite much with MS-DOS
> (sometimes to often). Actually it is very similar to MS-DOS (not only
> Unix; like I told before). The subdirectories are handeled like in
> MS-DOS. I never worked with CPM/68k but there was a time when I wanted
> to build such a system (was too expensive), so I know at least some
> facts about it. Unfortunately I don't have access to my documentations
> right now... but I'll dig it out when there is need for it.
> (Then I can post a comparison of the system calls.)
> In general you push your desired function on the stack and call the
> system. And this functions are different in both OS's as I know.
> Next: You've got several system components: GEMDOS,BIOS,XBIOS,GEM and a
> grafics kernel. GEMDOS is not GEM, it's more like BDOS in CP/M.
> The XBIOS is an extension of the BIOS. The kernel supports the GEM (You
> can use it without GEM if you like). Even without GEM the TOS doesn't
> look like CPM/68k. Try to run an CPM program (of course from the TOS)
> und you'll see what happens...several bombs...reset....:-)
> 
>   The problem is that ATARI had the intention to use CPM (and told so)
> but changed their mind later on. But several M-magazines are still
> writing something about CPM68k on the ST. If they would have tried
> to run an CPM program the would have known better.
> Finally, I'm not the ultimate source for such informations, I know
> some facts but not all...feel free to revise the above.
> 
> Johann Zuschlag (I6191008@DBSTU1.BITNET)
> 

* * * * FLAME ON * * * *

	Well, I have had enough.  This posting is 100% ST.  It has
absolutly no relation to the Atari 8 bit computers.  It was posted
by some A**H*** at info-atari.  They are the ones that split the
group in the first place.  He should know better.  But he doesn't.

KEEP THE ST CR*P OFF ATARI8.  PUT THE ST SH*T IN ATARI16.

* * * * * flame off * * * * (Until another ST posting is made.)


From inside the Tesseract of
	Clancy Malloy
	(ihnp4!ihlpa!freak)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Everyone looked up and realized that we were only tenants of this world; |
|    We have been given a new lease, and a warning, from the landlord.     |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1159@ihlpa.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ihlpa!freak

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpa.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ihlpa!freak
From: freak@ihlpa.UUCP (Malloy)
Newsgroups: net.micro.atari8
Subject: The correct use of the atari sub-groups
Message-ID: <1159@ihlpa.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 28-Feb-86 03:07:59 EST
Article-I.D.: ihlpa.1159
Posted: Fri Feb 28 03:07:59 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Mar-86 03:30:32 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 58