Article View: net.micro.att
Article #1179NEED HELP WITH SIMULTASK on 6300+
From: Stu Heiss
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1986 15:40
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1986 15:40
15 lines
1162 bytes
1162 bytes
Summary:
Expires:
Well, not exactly. What I want to know is whether simultask will run on
microport unix. Microport claims to be binary compatable with 6300+
unix and if simultask is strictly user code with, it seems it should
work. I've asked microport about this and without divulging details,
they say it's not as easy as that. By December it should be moot as
microport plans to have simultask available, but I would like to use it
in an application now. Does anyone have the scoop? Please reply via
e-mail and I'll post a summary if any hard facts show up.
--
Stu Heiss {ihnp4!jpusa1!stu}
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<110@jpusa1.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!jpusa1!stuReferences:
<432@we53.UUCP> <1972@mtuxo.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!jpusa1!stu From: stu@jpusa1.UUCP (Stu Heiss) Newsgroups: net.micro.att Subject: NEED HELP WITH SIMULTASK on 6300+ Message-ID: <110@jpusa1.UUCP> Date: Fri, 12-Sep-86 11:40:15 EDT Article-I.D.: jpusa1.110 Posted: Fri Sep 12 11:40:15 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Sep-86 06:07:54 EDT References: <432@we53.UUCP> <1972@mtuxo.UUCP> Reply-To: stu@jpusa1.UUCP (Stu Heiss) Followup-To: net.micro.att Organization: JPUSA - Chicago, IL Lines: 12