Re: standardizing BDS C (sort of)

Article View: net.micro.cpm

Article #5331

#5331

From: Mark Dapoz
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1986 03:21

14 lines
1169 bytes

In article <882@sigma.UUCP> bill@sigma.UUCP (William Swan) writes:

>Has anybody "standardized" BDS C?

From what I hear, there should be a new version of BDS C comming out that
is supposed to be "more K&R compatible".  That could mean anything from
fixing the I/O routines to adding auto initialization.  One thing that
it is supposed to have is a float data type (about time!!).  You might
want to check with the author to see what he really is doing for the next
release before you take on any really big projects for overhauling the
existing BDS C.

	-Mark Dapoz
	mdapoz@watrose.UUCP

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8185@watrose.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!caip!clyde!watmath!watnot!watrose!mdapoz

References: <882@sigma.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!caip!clyde!watmath!watnot!watrose!mdapoz
From: mdapoz@watrose.UUCP (Mark Dapoz)
Newsgroups: net.micro.cpm
Subject: Re: standardizing BDS C (sort of)
Message-ID: <8185@watrose.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 8-Oct-86 23:21:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: watrose.8185
Posted: Wed Oct  8 23:21:43 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Oct-86 06:33:44 EDT
References: <882@sigma.UUCP>
Reply-To: mdapoz@watrose.UUCP (Mark Dapoz)
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 14
Keywords: BDS C, standards

Reply to Parent Message