Re: .LLB vs .LBR ???

Article View: net.micro.cpm

Article #5390

#5390

From: Manasseh Katz
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1986 17:13

4 lines
710 bytes

I think you're right about the original LU program, but I am using
LU86 - a CPM-86 version of LU by a different author, and the documentation
says it will allow LBR files to be put into an LBR file, which gets
rid of the need for .LLB files.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4824@brl-smoke.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!MKATZ@umd2.umd.edu

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!MKATZ@umd2.umd.edu
From: MKATZ@umd2.umd.edu (Manasseh Katz)
Newsgroups: net.micro.cpm
Subject: Re: .LLB vs .LBR ???
Message-ID: <4824@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 22-Oct-86 12:13:33 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.4824
Posted: Wed Oct 22 12:13:33 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 27-Oct-86 00:36:10 EST
Sender: news@brl-smoke.ARPA
Lines: 4