🚀 go-pugleaf

<>

After thinking about this situation for a while, I can see Apple's
justification in not doing this (upgrading an unofficially modified Mac).
I would think that the main reasons are:
	They intend to reuse the old boards, and they would have to
separate those with do-it-yourself chips from the Apple certified chips.
Here, I think it's a case of "We don't want to guarantee someone else's
parts"
	In the case of a hyperdrive, here the old board is physically
modified to accept the drive.  Wouldn't Apple have to make a modification
to their new board to match the modification done to the old?

	These are conjectures on my part, but I think they're valid   
points.  I don't think it's malice on Apple's part against third party
RAM updates, but merely an attempt to limit their liability and to
insure the functionality of parts they receive/reship.

Owen Hartnett
omh%brown@csnet-relay