Re: ExperLisp Comments Sought

Article View: net.micro.mac

Article #1374

#1374

From: John W Peterson
Date: Sat, 11 May 1985 22:32

3 lines
713 bytes

Oops, in my previous review of ExperLisp I claimed they hadn't implemented
DefStruct.  This isn't true; they do have a limited implementation of CL
defstruct.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3334@utah-cs.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!utah-cs!jwp

References: <863@mhuxt.UUCP>, <3333@utah-cs.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-cs.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!utah-cs!jwp
From: jwp@utah-cs.UUCP (John W Peterson)
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac
Subject: Re: ExperLisp Comments Sought
Message-ID: <3334@utah-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 11-May-85 18:32:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: utah-cs.3334
Posted: Sat May 11 18:32:13 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 13-May-85 00:33:32 EDT
References: <863@mhuxt.UUCP>, <3333@utah-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Univ of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 3

Reply to Parent Message