🚀 go-pugleaf

> From: gam@amdahl.UUCP (gam)
> Date: 4 Jan 85 09:03:52 GMT
> 
> [1]	Someone will complain that "net.sources is archived automatically
> 	by many sites and they might not want net.sources.mac!"

I've heard this so many times I'm almost beginning to believe it is true.
My sys file currently says:

SOURCES:net.sources,!net.sources.all::/usr/lib/news/sfar net.sources
SOURCES:net.sources.bugs::/usr/lib/news/sfar net.sources.bugs

Voila...'net.sources.bugs' articles don't get into my 'net.sources'
archive.  Am I missing something on this issue, or is the answer as
easy as this?


> [3]	What are you going to do when you start getting the
> 	"Does anyone have a copy of MacWidgit?" articles in
> 	net.sources.mac?  Will there be a net.wanted.sources.mac,
> 	too?

In chuq's original message he suggested that one of the moderater's
responsibilities should be to compile an index.  An index would also be
a good idea for net.sources, *especially* if the index contained the
Message-ID's of the extraneous discussion articles in a format so that I
can automatically zap them from my archive.  If anybody is interested,
I suppose I could volunteer to make such an index.

-- 

Chip Rosenthal, Intel/Santa Clara
{cbosgd,idi,intelca,icalqa,kremvax,qubix,ucscc} ! {t4test,t12tst} ! {chip,news}