🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1858@sdcc6.UUCP> ir408@sdcc6.UUCP (ir408) writes:
>As someone who has wasted a large amount of time (an invaluable
>commodity to some of us) replacing protected software, I find the
>cavalier attitude of Mr. Parker contemptable. As a "toolmaker" I know
>that I cannot control the purpose to which my tools are put, and am
>realistic enough to know that I cannot dictate morality to those who use
>the information I impart to them. I have one sure solution to the
>problem of having your ideas "ripped off". Don't have any. Judging by
>your most recent example, we will not be missing out on much. 
>
>Jeff E Mandel MD
>SDCC6!IR408
>UCSD Anesthesia Research
>

In reply, I hardly think I'm trying to dictate morality. I simply think
that posting such a program to a public net might not be responcible.
As to my ideas, you don't know me, so I doubt you could give an accurate
synopsis. Thanks for the kind words.

ps: you're right, it's Byrne. Sorry David.
-- 

J Bradford Parker
uucp: seismo!harvard!gcc-opus!brad
otherwise: what else is there ?

"Say something once, Why say it again ?"
	- David Byrne