Article View: net.micro.mac
Article #5508Re: Packit I vs. II
From: Jeff Meyer
Date: Sun, 04 May 1986 23:15
Date: Sun, 04 May 1986 23:15
12 lines
1197 bytes
1197 bytes
Hear, hear! Let me also add my voice to the requests to not use the Packit
II compression method. Don't make the free passing of PD software a source
of funds for someone trying to take advantage of a standard. The Packit
format would never have caught on in the first place if PackIt was originally
shareware.
"A man who has no business being anyone's role model..."
Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
ARPA: fluke!moriarty@uw-beaver.ARPA
UUCP: {uw-beaver, sun, allegra, sb6, lbl-csam}!fluke!moriarty
<*> DISCLAIMER: Do what you want with me, but leave my employers alone! <*>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<171@colossus.fluke.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!bullwinkle!uw-beaver!fluke!moriartyReferences:
<630@tekig4.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!bullwinkle!uw-beaver!fluke!moriarty From: moriarty@fluke.UUCP (Jeff Meyer) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: Packit I vs. II Message-ID: <171@colossus.fluke.UUCP> Date: Sun, 4-May-86 19:15:02 EDT Article-I.D.: colossus.171 Posted: Sun May 4 19:15:02 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 8-May-86 07:45:02 EDT References: <630@tekig4.UUCP> Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA Lines: 12 Keywords: Value-added, necessary, hold-up