Article View: net.micro.mac
Article #5709Experience with 512K -> Mac+ upgrade.
From: walter jeffries
Date: Sat, 17 May 1986 04:45
Date: Sat, 17 May 1986 04:45
11 lines
1272 bytes
1272 bytes
I've now had my Mac+ upgrade for two weeks. When I was debating getting it
I was worried about the reports of the analogue board failures associated with
upgrades. (I got both diskdrive/ROM and 1MB memory upgrade) It has now been
running continuously for about two weeks (I never turn it off as they run best
in steady state). Interestingly it is running noticeably *cooler* with 1MB
than it was with only 512KB of memory. I have also had no problem with the
programer's switch which I use a fair bit...
Thought those of you considering an upgrade might be interested in hearing
some good news...
Ain't it great leading a charmed life...
-Walter.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4573@dartvax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!dartvax!waltervjReferences:
<915@ihlpl.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dartvax.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!dartvax!waltervj From: waltervj@dartvax.UUCP (walter jeffries) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Experience with 512K -> Mac+ upgrade. Message-ID: <4573@dartvax.UUCP> Date: Sat, 17-May-86 00:45:41 EDT Article-I.D.: dartvax.4573 Posted: Sat May 17 00:45:41 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 19-May-86 06:26:22 EDT References: <915@ihlpl.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH Lines: 11