🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3453@ut-ngp.UUCP> werner@ngp.UUCP (PUT YOUR NAME HERE) writes:
>> For the record my 128KROM/drive upgrade installed last weekend came with
>> Macintosh Plus System Tools. This contained system 3.1, finder 5.2, Font/DA
>> Mover 3.1, Imagewriter 2.2.
>>
>> I assume that as of a week ago, this is the official supported level.
>>
>> I've never had a problem with system 3.1, and the information I've gotten
>> is that the problems it has only exist with CERTAIN, VERY LARGE applications.
>
>Apple *OFFICIALLY* discourages the use of System-3.1 (that's been printed in
>many places) - and I'd bet you can't find a single Apple-employee that would
>use System-3.1 himself.
>

That's nice, where is it?
Apple's *OFFICIAL* statement, posted on Compuserve Macintosh Developers
group said 3.0 was DANGEROUS, 3.1 had bugs related to memory management
of large programs (they bomb), and that 3.1.1 fixed THOSE bugs.

It's real nice that Apple employees don't use 3.1,
but are you sure they use 3.2? THEY could be on 3.4 for all we know, OR
CARE!

The latest DISTRIBUTED AT A DEALER WITH HARDWARE ON A DISK MULTIPLY
GENERATED BY APPLE (no hand printed labels, please) system/finder 
that I have heard of is 3.1/5.2.

>Finder 5.3 and System 3.2 prereleases seem to be faster and pretty reliable
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^
>with my working-set of programs (no Laserwriter, no AppleTalk, no SCSI)

Weren't we talking about OFFICIAL?

I haven't been able to get a copy of 3.1.1 system, let alone 3.2.

Go suck an egg.
-- 
 Jim Budler
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
 (408) 749-5806
 Usenet: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amdcad!jimb
 Compuserve:	72415,1200