🚀 go-pugleaf

A Slight Flame.

In article <2201@cbosgd.UUCP> mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton) writes:
>
>Actually, the plan is for net.sources.mac to be replaced with
>mod.mac.sources and mod.mac.binaries.  The latter groups already exist,
>but I haven't seen any traffic in them yet.
>{etc.}
>	Mark

Amazing. I've been following both net.news and net.news.group for
about five months and I've seen only a little discussion about this
and never had read this particular solution.  But that is not my flame.

The thing that riles me is that our site apparently only got the
newgroup message for these (and a bunch of other moderated groups)
within the last twenty-four hours.  Praytell, how can this have only
happened here recently when you state that these groups "already
exist" as if they HAVE existed for some time and that everyone ought
to know about them???  More than that, how could (for example) I have
generated any traffic in a group of whose existence I was previously
unaware?

If there is a simple explanation for this, I will humbly accept
correction.

ZtF