Article View: net.micro.mac
Article #6158Re: Megamax bug?
From: pedz
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1986 19:59
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1986 19:59
40 lines
1401 bytes
1401 bytes
main()
{
int i, j;
for (i = 10; i--;);
j = i;
}
CODE SEG "main"
main:/* global */
LINK A6,L$0
MOVE #10,-2(A6)
L3:
L4:
L2:
MOVE -2(A6),D0 << Get i
SUBQ #1,-2(A6) << do the decrement
TST D0 << do the test
BNE.S L3
L5:
MOVE -2(A6),-4(A6)
L1:
UNLK A6
RTS
L$0: .EQU #-4
_initargcv:/* global */
RTS
Matt gets the cookie this time. The original bug notice was correct
in his statements about how C should behave. The above code segment
shows that in the current release, this is not a bug. I am reasonable
sure that it has never been a bug but perhaps someone has a really old
version. I would suggest that the original poster disassemble his
output and look at the code. I am sure it will be different from
above but the important thing is that the decrement is done before the
test.
Perry Smith
pedz@megamax
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3700001@megamax>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!megamax!pedzReferences:
<1023@k.cs.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!megamax!pedz From: pedz@megamax Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: Megamax bug? Message-ID: <3700001@megamax> Date: Fri, 20-Jun-86 15:59:00 EDT Article-I.D.: megamax.3700001 Posted: Fri Jun 20 15:59:00 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 23-Jun-86 01:16:38 EDT References: <1023@k.cs.cmu.edu> Lines: 40 Nf-ID: #R:k.cs.cmu.edu:1023:megamax:3700001:000:829 Nf-From: megamax!pedz Jun 20 14:59:00 1986