Re: MANX Aztec C -- as good as it looks?

Article View: net.micro.mac

Article #6264

#6264

From: Steve Kearns
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1986 17:34

10 lines
1153 bytes

In article <324@aecom.UUCP> naftoli@aecom.UUCP (Robert N. Berlinger) writes:
>I've been looking around for a new C compiler (since Megamax is a dud),
>and it looks like Aztec C is very complete, UNIX like, and fast.
>Can anyone recommend it?

I started using Aztec C, but I have switched to Lightspeed C.  The system
is so good it can easily cut development time in half, as well as 
making it alot more fun.  It is also significantly cheaper, yet the
documentation is packaged alot better.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2682@columbia.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!ll-xn!nike!lll-crg!seismo!columbia!garfield.columbia.edu!kearns

References: <324@aecom.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!ll-xn!nike!lll-crg!seismo!columbia!garfield.columbia.edu!kearns
From: kearns@garfield.columbia.edu (Steve Kearns)
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac
Subject: Re: MANX Aztec C -- as good as it looks?
Message-ID: <2682@columbia.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Jun-86 13:34:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: columbia.2682
Posted: Mon Jun 30 13:34:03 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 1-Jul-86 03:20:23 EDT
References: <324@aecom.UUCP>
Sender: nobody@columbia.UUCP
Reply-To: kearns@garfield.UUCP (Steve Kearns)
Distribution: net
Organization: Columbia University CS Department
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message