Re: Orphaned Response

Article View: net.micro.mac

Article #638

#638

From: bhyde
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 1985 06:01

6 lines
831 bytes

It is my impression that the SUMMac stuff is a little sloppy about
the signed/unsigned differences in general.  This was true of the
original release and I haven't checked the newer release.  I presume
this is because most of the pascal interfaces are also sloppy about
these differences.
  So... worry about the signs.		ben hyde

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1968@inmet.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!cca!ima!inmet!bhyde

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!cca!ima!inmet!bhyde
From: bhyde@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <1968@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 17-Feb-85 01:01:28 EST
Article-I.D.: inmet.1968
Posted: Sun Feb 17 01:01:28 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Feb-85 05:20:46 EST
Lines: 6
Nf-ID: #R:sask:-16900:inmet:26700006:177600:330
Nf-From: inmet!bhyde    Feb 14 10:01:00 1985