Article View: net.micro.mac
Article #6617Re: Re: Mac Cache
From: Gregory Dudek
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1986 18:02
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1986 18:02
20 lines
1659 bytes
1659 bytes
I find it very hard to believe that the Cache could be designed
as dangerously as people have been suggesting. I use mine all the time
and despite many crashes experienced while mucking around, have
never seen any signs of corrupted disk blocks which might be due to
the cache.
Can anybody from apple confirm or refute the serious allegations?
As for the claim that disk I/O only seemed to take place when a file was
closed, wouldn't an obvious and safe design for the cache would be one that had
write-through only for file-system information, and maybe the Desktop.
If this is what's happening, couldn't it explain some of the observed
I/O activity. i.e. a file's data blocks
don't get write-through so ordinary file capture doesn't seem to cause
immediate disk I/O.
--
Dept. of Computer Science (vision group) University of Toronto
Usenet: {linus, ihnp4, allegra, decvax, floyd}!utcsri!dudek
CSNET: dudek@Toronto
ARPA: dudek%Toronto@CSNet-Relay
Paper mail: 10 King's College Circle, Toronto, Canada
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2052@utai.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsri!utai!dudekReferences:
<932@hounx.UUCP> <842@wang.UUCP> <2017@calmasd.CALMA.UUCP> <394@aecom.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utai.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsri!utai!dudek From: dudek@utai.UUCP (Gregory Dudek) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: Re: Mac Cache Message-ID: <2052@utai.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-Jul-86 14:02:38 EDT Article-I.D.: utai.2052 Posted: Wed Jul 30 14:02:38 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 30-Jul-86 14:43:23 EDT References: <932@hounx.UUCP> <842@wang.UUCP> <2017@calmasd.CALMA.UUCP> <394@aecom.UUCP> Reply-To: dudek@utai.UUCP (Gregory Dudek) Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto Lines: 20