Article View: net.micro.mac
Article #6926Re: Re: Multitasking Considered Useless?
From: Tim Maroney
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1986 08:50
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1986 08:50
28 lines
2215 bytes
2215 bytes
I'm currently working on UNIX-style multitasking software for the Mac
(experimentally). Naturally, the biggest problem with multitasking, whether
Switcher, Servant, or mine, is the lack of memory management hardware in the
Macintosh. I was thinking about putting together a memory-management add-on
board which would run a simple dual-processor multitasking Mac OS (using the
68000 as a hardware controller, and a 68010 at 10 MHz with no bus
arbitration for user-mode software). I was going to use a 10 MHz 68451 chip
or two for the memory management, but it turns out that this takes 200 ns to
translate a logical address to a physical one. This is clearly not
acceptable performance. Anyone know of good memory management chips that
would be reasonably compatible with Motorola hardware? (I know, I know:
"Why don't you burn your own logic arrays?")
This project would be a spare-time thing for my own fun, but if it worked
out particularly well I would consider licensing or selling the board.
Incidentally, the Mac Programmers' Workshop contains strong hints that the
forthcoming new Mac will contain a Motorola 68851 Paged Memory Management
Unit chip. This chip is scheduled to be released last quarter this year or
first quarter next; Apple obviously has obtained some advance copies and
played with them, at the least. I'd like to do the same, obviously, but
there are a few little availability problems....
--
Tim Maroney, Electronic Village Idiot
{ihnp4,sun,well,ptsfa,lll-crg,frog}!hoptoad!tim (uucp)
hoptoad!tim@lll-crg (arpa)
These are the official opinions of the Vatican Council of Bishops.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1036@hoptoad.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!hoptoad!timReferences:
<3150@ism780c.UUCP> <617@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <3218@ism780c.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!hoptoad!tim From: tim@hoptoad.uucp (Tim Maroney) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: Re: Multitasking Considered Useless? Message-ID: <1036@hoptoad.uucp> Date: Mon, 25-Aug-86 04:50:29 EDT Article-I.D.: hoptoad.1036 Posted: Mon Aug 25 04:50:29 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 25-Aug-86 19:31:26 EDT References: <3150@ism780c.UUCP> <617@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <3218@ism780c.UUCP> Reply-To: tim@hoptoad.UUCP (Tim Maroney) Organization: Centram Systems, Berkeley Lines: 28