Article View: net.micro.mac
Article #6951Re: MacWorld Show impression
From: Jim Budler
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1986 05:36
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1986 05:36
65 lines
2857 bytes
2857 bytes
In article <444@aecom.UUCP> naftoli@aecom.UUCP (Robert N. Berlinger) writes:
>> But I was completely blown away by *large screens.*
>
>I think everyone is, but the question is do we want to spend
>~$2000 for something that could be very cheap once the open Mac comes
>out? To me, the price seems artificially high because of the fact
>that "we've got no other choice". Would a "similar" monitor with the
>same resolution and graphics card cost as much for an IBM PC (not to say
>that they are comparable!)?
>
>Are we getting ripped off, or is the dollars per pixel ratio good?
>--
Opinion:
We are not getting ripped off.
The dollar per pixel ratio is good, by 'present' standards.
A previous response to the same article said approx.:
' Why not by a Sun standalone for approx. the same amount'
implying the Sun standalone was better. That's a valid implication for
some users, but not for others. You can't run Macintosh software on a Sun.
I wish we had more options, say:
1. 72x72 9 inch (standard Macintosh)
2. 72x72 12 inch ~$200 - $500
3. Something in between ~$1000
4. The $2000 high resolution, large monitors.
All of the above may be available with the 'Open Mac' but I bet it will
cost me more to replace my Mac with an 'Open Mac' than to add features.
As always I will make THAT choice when necessary, not on advance speculation.
If I had a commercial application running on a Mac, say that Mac-Apollo
connection, I'd welcome the $2000 large, high pixel screen, and I'd guess
the users/developers are jumping.
Me, I'm waiting. But I'm not feeling ripped off. I've priced machines
which give the same ability the Prodigy + Mac + large screen provides.
And $13000 Sun vs. $11000 Mac + Prodigy + Screen comes down to:
"Unix + Unix applications vs. Mac + Mac applications"
not
"$11000 vs. $13000"
Each buyer must make his own choice.
P.S.
I love Unix and use it where it fits.
I love my Mac, and use it where it fits.
I would love to use one machine for both. I can't.
I feel frustrated, but not ripped off.
--
Jim Budler
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
(408) 749-5806
Usenet: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amdcad!jimb
Compuserve: 72415,1200
Once and for all: I like my Macintosh
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<12845@amdcad.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!pyramid!amdahl!amdcad!jimbReferences:
<853@wang.UUCP> <444@aecom.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!pyramid!amdahl!amdcad!jimb From: jimb@amdcad.UUCP (Jim Budler) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: MacWorld Show impression Message-ID: <12845@amdcad.UUCP> Date: Wed, 27-Aug-86 01:36:03 EDT Article-I.D.: amdcad.12845 Posted: Wed Aug 27 01:36:03 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 27-Aug-86 11:55:46 EDT References: <853@wang.UUCP> <444@aecom.UUCP> Reply-To: jimb@amdcad.UUCP (Jim Budler) Distribution: net Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California Lines: 65