Article View: net.micro.mac
Article #7349Re: wordstar pathnames
From: Andy Hogan
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1986 21:54
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1986 21:54
43 lines
2788 bytes
2788 bytes
In article <13112@amdcad.UUCP>, jimb@amdcad.UUCP (Jim Budler) writes:
> In article <8609182052.AA24629@cory.Berkeley.EDU> (Matt Dillon) writes:
>
> | >Gack! Last I knew, WordStar STILL won't accept pathnames. IBM certainly
> | >did NOT change from flat to hierarchical without any problems.
> | >-Steve Dorner
> | The point is that it was upwardly compatible... you could still give
> | Wordstar non-path file names.
> | -Matt
> The point is that wordstar is in \ws.
> To edit autoexec.bat I have to copy it to \ws, edit it there, copy it
> back. There are MANY excellent PC programs which are STILL limited in this
> manner.
>
> Jim Budler X X
IBM 'fixed' this brain-damage with a brain-damaged solution: the 'subst'
command in DOS 3.1 (I think that's the earliest...). This lets you use
a drive designator (say, k:) to pinch-hit for a path (say, \ws\andy\memo).
Unfortunately, this drive designator collides head on with the logical
drive designators used by networks. There is no check for other, similar
assignments. The DOS substitution overrides. This sucks, since you
either wind up dumping network volumes or constantly re-substituting
path-drive combos. Either one negates the advantage that 'subst'
was supposed to create.
As I understand it, Mac programs that were carefully designed from the
start (that is, the designer(s) read and understood the fine print) needed
no changes to work with HFS, although they may have found some to be
desirable. I don't know of any early PC software that can make that claim.
So since PC DOS *and* its solution are both still not too good, it seems to
me that Apple did a much better job of it.
Making compatibility possible on an expanding product line is very difficult.
The big difference I see between IBM and Apple is that Apple tries, and
IBM just says "well, NOW compatibility means this!" Of course, their
relative market positions may have something to do with that.
--
Notice how they do not so much fly, as plummet. {appropriate head movement}
--Monty Python (Flying Sheep Sketch)
Andy Hogan Rosemount, Inc. Mpls MN
path: ...ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!mmm!rosevax!hogan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<642@rosevax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!caip!dayton!rosevax!hoganReferences:
<8609182052.AA24629@cory.Berkeley.EDU> <13112@amdcad.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!caip!dayton!rosevax!hogan From: hogan@rosevax.UUCP (Andy Hogan) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: wordstar pathnames Message-ID: <642@rosevax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 25-Sep-86 17:54:38 EDT Article-I.D.: rosevax.642 Posted: Thu Sep 25 17:54:38 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 26-Sep-86 03:16:28 EDT References: <8609182052.AA24629@cory.Berkeley.EDU> <13112@amdcad.UUCP> Organization: Rosemount Inc., Eden Prairie, MN Lines: 43