Thread View: net.micro.mac
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Jeff Harrow NCSE TWO/E92 DTN=247...
Thu, 11 Apr 1985 14:47
Mac-XL
Author: Jeff Harrow NCSE TWO/E92 DTN=247...
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1985 14:47
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1985 14:47
24 lines
1341 bytes
1341 bytes
I'm wondering just how good the MAC-XL really is:
My previous experience with the Lisa indicated **ENORMOUS** amounts of
time for disk I/O, on the order of MINUTES, sometimes, to load or put
away a program.
Does anyone know if this has been fixed, and if the pixel size problem
is fixed NOW, as opposed to "manana"?
Additionally, info I have seen indicates that the XL is about .2 slower
than the Mac due to having the Mac's ROM in RAM. Any comments?
Jeff
Work address:
ARPAnet: HARROW%EXODUS.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
Usenet: {allegra,Shasta,decvax}!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-exodus!harrow
Easynet: EXODUS::HARROW
Telephone: (617)858-3134
USPS: Digital Equipment Corp.
Mail stop: TWO/E92
1925 Andover St.
Tewksbury, MA 01876
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads