Re: 80x86 vs. 680x0 (was Re: National's 32332)

Article View: net.micro.ns32k

Article #18

#18

From: freed
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1986 19:36

13 lines
1147 bytes

> We went one step further - John Reiser at Valid took SVS 68010 pascal
> object code and munged the bits into 80286 code. Guess what? The 286
> code was 15%-20% smaller. You can't complain about diferent compilers,

I feel that this method while interesting, is not significant. That is
about the improvement that could be expected when compiler generated code
is massaged by a competent assembly programmer...
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Erik James Freed
			   Aurora Systems
			   San Francisco, CA
			   ptsfa!aum!freed

Technical Details

Message-ID: <735@aum.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!qantel!ptsfa!aum!freed

References: <746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!qantel!ptsfa!aum!freed
From: freed@aum.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.ns32k
Subject: Re: 80x86 vs. 680x0 (was Re: National's 32332)
Message-ID: <735@aum.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Jun-86 15:36:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: aum.735
Posted: Thu Jun 19 15:36:48 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Jun-86 01:19:28 EDT
References: <746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: The Aurora Systems Bunch
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message