32332: how much faster than the 32032 ?

Article View: net.micro.ns32k

Article #39

#39

From: Eric H Jensen
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1986 22:09

12 lines
1114 bytes

Maybe this subject has been discussed here before, but ...

Given the same clock speeds how much faster is the 32332 than the
32032?  What are the significant contributors to the increased speed?
I expect the answer to this last question to mention "better
micro-code".  I have heard that the micro-code for the 32032 is very
poor, can someone comment on this?
-- 
eric h. jensen        (S1 Project @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
Phone: (415) 423-0229 USMail: LLNL, P.O. Box 5503, L-276, Livermore, Ca., 94550
ARPA:  ehj@angband    UUCP:   ...!decvax!decwrl!mordor!angband!ehj

Technical Details

Message-ID: <15218@mordor.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!sri-spam!mordor!ehj

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!sri-spam!mordor!ehj
From: ehj@mordor.ARPA (Eric H Jensen)
Newsgroups: net.micro.ns32k
Subject: 32332: how much faster than the 32032 ?
Message-ID: <15218@mordor.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 8-Sep-86 18:09:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: mordor.15218
Posted: Mon Sep  8 18:09:16 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 8-Sep-86 23:34:34 EDT
Reply-To: ehj@mordor.UUCP (Eric H Jensen)
Distribution: net
Organization: S-1 Project, LLNL
Lines: 12