Re: 32332: how much faster than the 32032 ?

Article View: net.micro.ns32k

Article #50

#50

From: Landon Curt Noll
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1986 19:56

11 lines
1130 bytes

In article <7115@utzoo.UUCP> henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) writes:
 >> ...In short the 32332 is a *YUMMO* part.
 >
 >In fact, it's what the 32032 *should* have been.  If National had been
 >shipping this at 32032 time, the 32000 series would have been a roaring
 >success.  As it is, I fear the 32332 is too little too late.

How True!  (note my comment was without reference to both time and/or other
more *YUMMO* parts)  So, will the 32532 suffer from the same problem?

chongo <I have my guess already> /\oo/\

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3721@amdahl.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!pyramid!amdahl!chongo

References: <15218@mordor.ARPA> <3657@amdahl.UUCP> <7115@utzoo.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!pyramid!amdahl!chongo
From: chongo@amdahl.UUCP (Landon Curt Noll)
Newsgroups: net.micro.ns32k
Subject: Re: 32332: how much faster than the 32032 ?
Message-ID: <3721@amdahl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Sep-86 15:56:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdahl.3721
Posted: Thu Sep 18 15:56:34 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Sep-86 01:07:19 EDT
References: <15218@mordor.ARPA> <3657@amdahl.UUCP> <7115@utzoo.UUCP>
Reply-To: chongo@amdahl.UUCP (Landon Curt Noll)
Organization: Amdahl Coup, UTS Products Hen house
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message