(More) Interleave Info

Article View: net.micro.pc

Article #5222

#5222

From: Rick Richardson
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1985 13:22

8 lines
1010 bytes

I have an IBM PC/AT running at 7.5 Mhz, and just ran a comparison
of interleave factors.  I found that an interleave of 4 gives the
best performance, although 5, 6, or 7 aren't much worse.  Anything
less than 4 caused the performance to be cut in half.  This was
under the Venix/286 SVR2 operating system.  Your (DOS) mileage may vary.

Rick Richardson, PC Research, Inc. (201) 922-1134
..!ihnp4!houxm!castor!{rer,pcrat!rer} <--Replies to here, not to homxb!!!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1072@homxb.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!petrus!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!homxb!gemini

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site homxb.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!petrus!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!homxb!gemini
From: gemini@homxb.UUCP (Rick Richardson)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: (More) Interleave Info
Message-ID: <1072@homxb.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 28-Dec-85 08:22:58 EST
Article-I.D.: homxb.1072
Posted: Sat Dec 28 08:22:58 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Dec-85 23:24:42 EST
Organization: PC Research, Inc.
Lines: 8