🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.micro.pc
Article #5532

Re: MS Word vs. WordPerfect

#5532
From: Mark D. Freeman
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1986 03:07
59 lines
3482 bytes
Summary:

In <504@imsvax.UUCP> ted@imsvax.UUCP (Ted Holden) writes:
>
>MSWord's spell checker, aside from not having the pheonetic capabilities at
>all, actually takes the words it feels are misspelled in a document and 
>presents them to you in a list TOTALLY OUT OF CONTEXT, for YOU to fix;  it 
>can't fix them.

Completely untrue of version 2.0 (released at least 12 months ago).

>The other thing which kills MSWord is its total lack of any reasonable indent
>function.  Govt. and military documents are filled with the following kind
>of construction:
>
>      a. a tab, followed by a letter or number and a period, and then an indent
>	 beginning on the exact same line, as you are seeing now.  MSWord has 
>	 no rational way of doing this;  you have to type the whole paragraph
>	 sans indents, indent the whole paragraph forward, and then indent the
>	 "tab a." back, like a Polish two-step or something.  A military 
>	 secretary or attache would go ape-**** trying to use MSWord.

Also completely untrue.  Set up a style sheet entry with the first line set
to have a left margin of whatever your tab is, and have the rest use the
proper left margin for the rest of the paragraph.  Also set a tab in this
entry where the left margin is for the majority of the paragraph. Keystrokes
to implement this (once it is a style sheet entry, for example 'hi' for
hanging indent) is <Alt-H> <Alt-I> a. <TAB> <type paragraph here>.

You are either using an old version, or have never read the manual.

>It is interesting to note, by the way, that WordPerfect, which is far and
>away the most serious PC word processor, is not copy-protected.

This is, unfortunately, a true statement.  Word's copy protection is a pain,
but is easily removed.  The spelling checker cannot hold a candle to that of
WordPerfect, although your criticism above is untrue.  WordPerfect 4.1 has
a wonderful thesaurus and can do math, both lacking in MS Word.

However, the style sheets and MS Word's method of displaying attributes is far
better than WP.  REVEAL CODES indeed!

I own copies of both, and use WP solely for documents with math requirements.



-- 
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Mark D. Freeman                     Guest account at The Ohio State University
StrongPoint Systems, Inc.				    mdf@osu-eddie.UUCP
209 Olentangy Street					  Mdf@Ohio-State.CSNET
Columbus, OH  43202-2340		       Mdf%Ohio-State@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
							 !cbosgd!osu-eddie!mdf
I disclaim even my very existance.

Acceptance without proof is the fundamental characteristic of Western religion,
 Rejection without proof is the fundamental characteristic of Western science.
		-- Gary Zukav from "The Dancing Wu Li Masters"
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1230@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!osu-eddie!mdf
References: <504@imsvax.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site osu-eddie.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!osu-eddie!mdf
From: mdf@osu-eddie.UUCP (Mark D. Freeman)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: MS Word vs. WordPerfect
Message-ID: <1230@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Feb-86 22:07:17 EST
Article-I.D.: osu-eddi.1230
Posted: Sat Feb  1 22:07:17 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 2-Feb-86 14:12:40 EST
References: <504@imsvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: mdf@osu-eddie.UUCP (Mark D. Freeman)
Organization: StrongPoint Systems, Inc. (guest of Ohio State U.)
Lines: 57