Re: Xenix shared memory

Article View: net.micro.pc

Article #5565

#5565

From: peterson
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1986 13:54

10 lines
1103 bytes

  The IBM PC AT Xenix shared memory documentation is wrong!  It has
been a while since I did this and I may not remember correctly, but
it seems that one of the parameters indicated as optional isn't.

  IBM is aware of the problem.  You should be able to get a fix, along
with a bunch of other fixes, from your dealer.  Beware, however: The
shared memory fix is also incorrect, although in a different place!
Use from the fix document only the part about the optional parameter
error.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <10200007@ti-csl>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!ti-csl!peterson

References: <5100115@uiucdcsb>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site ti-csl
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!ti-csl!peterson
From: peterson@ti-csl
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: Xenix shared memory
Message-ID: <10200007@ti-csl>
Date: Mon, 3-Feb-86 08:54:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ti-csl.10200007
Posted: Mon Feb  3 08:54:00 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Feb-86 20:55:54 EST
References: <5100115@uiucdcsb>
Lines: 10
Nf-ID: #R:uiucdcsb:5100115:ti-csl:10200007:000:487
Nf-From: ti-csl!peterson    Feb  3 07:54:00 1986

Reply to Parent Message