🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <598@nicmad.UUCP>, brown@nicmad.UUCP writes:
> In article <583@talcott.UUCP> lotto@talcott.UUCP (Jerry Lotto) writes:
> >I recently picked up a TEAC 55 series drive for the AT from PCs Limited
> >(Yes, I should have known better). I ran into two problems.
> >
> >First of all, the drive was built with the planar board mounted on top...

> We (I) have been buying the TEAC FD55B drives for our XTs for some time now.
> All of the drives that I have received are circuit board on the bottom.
> The red light on the front panel is above the slot for the floppy.  I have
> never had any problem fitting them into a PC or XT frame.  I know it isn't
> an AT,

Thus the problem. The lever either swings opposite to the way the other
drive lever swings and they hit each other, or you mount the drive upside
down.

> >The other problem was that the rails were cut so far off that I would
> >have had to shave off 1/4" in order to fit it under the existing drive.

>         but shouldn't the hole sizes be the same?  I even stack two of the
> 55Bs together and install them into one of the PC/XT slots.

And in fact the hole size was fine, what I said was "the rails were cut so
far off". TEAC did not make the rails, they were obviously purchased by
PC Limited (and added value?). Let me add that I was very satisfied with my
two TEAC drives when I owned a PC. Furthermore, I am sure that there is a
model of 55's that is the right color/chirality for an AT. I just think that
the ability to determine the proper combination is beyond most retailers.
Purchasers of add in drives for AT's and clones should be aware of these
two potential problems.
-- 

Gerald Lotto - Harvard Chemistry Dept.

 UUCP:  {seismo,harpo,ihnp4,linus,allegra,ut-sally}!harvard!lhasa!lotto
 ARPA:  lotto@harvard.EDU
 CSNET: lotto%harvard@csnet-relay