Speakers control, IBM and cloens.

Article View: net.micro.pc

Article #7033

#7033

From: Magnus Karlson
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1986 05:13

12 lines
1049 bytes

I am involved in writing (and maintaining) a resident program.
Some days ago i resived a error report saying that the BASIC 2.0
compiler could sometimes leave the bits 0 and 1 on, which can result
in a etarnal beep if you output a <Bell>. I find it easy to include a patch
but since i am not sure about the portabilty i like to ask the question.

Does anyone know off a clone that don't use bit 0 and 1 of port 61H(ex)
to control the speaker?

	Mail would be much appreciated, both negative and possitive!!!

	Magnus Karlson

Technical Details

Message-ID: <172@suadb.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!seismo!mcvax!enea!suadb!mk

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!seismo!mcvax!enea!suadb!mk
From: mk@suadb.UUCP (Magnus Karlson)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Speakers control, IBM and cloens.
Message-ID: <172@suadb.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Jun-86 01:13:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: suadb.172
Posted: Mon Jun 30 01:13:20 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 1-Jul-86 03:47:26 EDT
Organization: University of Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 12
Keywords: Port 61H(ex) Bit 1,0, Basic 2.0, Resident programs.