Article View: net.micro.pc
Article #7175wanted: 8086 code improvers/optimizer
From: Joseph D. Shapiro
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1986 16:51
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1986 16:51
17 lines
1146 bytes
1146 bytes
It seems that the optimizing functions of the Microsoft C compiler are less than 'optimum'. The thing that I am looking for would take the -S output (assembly language source) and produce better assembly language source. I would prefer a good commercially supported product over freeware (that's a switch, huh?) but will take what I can get. -- -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ Joseph D. Shapiro "He who hesitates Bunker Ramo Information Systems is lunch" ...ittatc!bunker!shap ...decvax!bunker!shap
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1216@bunker.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!bunker!shapShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site bunker.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!bunker!shap From: shap@bunker.UUCP (Joseph D. Shapiro) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: wanted: 8086 code improvers/optimizer Message-ID: <1216@bunker.UUCP> Date: Mon, 7-Jul-86 12:51:29 EDT Article-I.D.: bunker.1216 Posted: Mon Jul 7 12:51:29 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 9-Jul-86 06:37:33 EDT Reply-To: shap@bunker.UUCP (Joseph D. Shapiro) Organization: Bunker Ramo, Trumbull Ct Lines: 17