Article View: net.micro.pc
Article #7412Re: Re: query on IBM PC editors
From: Joel Upchurch
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1986 21:33
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1986 21:33
20 lines
1379 bytes
1379 bytes
>>> I'm looking for a good editor for programming under MS-DOS...
>
>>General consensus is probably that there are THREE good editors available
>>for the PC commercially... BRIEF, EPSILON and KEDIT.
>
>Let's make that FOUR good editors by adding PC/VI to this list.
>
>John Korn
If if runs anything like vi on Unix I would hardly call it
a good editor, ubiquitous maybe. The user interface stinks
in comparsion the Rand editor on Unix, SPF on MVS or XEDIT
on VM, just to name a few I'm familar with. On a feature
basis it is inferior to both Rand and XEDIT and SPF could
give it a good run even on features.
--
Joel Upchurch @ CONCURRENT Computer Corporation (A Perkin-Elmer Company)
Southern Development Center
2486 Sand Lake Road/ Orlando, Florida 32809/ (305)850-1031
{decvax!ucf-cs, ihnp4!pesnta, vax135!petsd}!peora!joel
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2266@peora.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!pyramid!pesnta!peora!joelReferences:
<35@datagen.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!pyramid!pesnta!peora!joel From: joel@peora.UUCP (Joel Upchurch) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: Re: Re: query on IBM PC editors Message-ID: <2266@peora.UUCP> Date: Fri, 25-Jul-86 17:33:09 EDT Article-I.D.: peora.2266 Posted: Fri Jul 25 17:33:09 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jul-86 22:03:36 EDT References: <35@datagen.UUCP> Organization: Concurrent Computer Corporation, Orlando, Fl Lines: 20